top of page
Search

California Finalizes Cybersecurity Audit Rules under CCPA

  • Writer: Katarzyna  Celińska
    Katarzyna Celińska
  • 3 days ago
  • 2 min read

The California Privacy Protection Agency has finalized long-awaited rules on automated decision making, risk assessments, and annual cybersecurity audits. These rules, adopted unanimously by the CPPA Board, are the result of over a year of debate and revisions.

 

ree


Key Takeaways

☑️ Annual Cybersecurity Audits: Businesses whose data processing presents significant risk to consumer privacy or security must undergo independent yearly audits.

☑️ Scope of Risk: Factors include company size, complexity, and the nature of personal information processed. Companies meeting revenue and data volume thresholds are automatically subject to the audit rule.

☑️ Independence Matters: Audits must be conducted by a qualified and objective professional, whether internal or external. Internal auditors must report to senior leadership without cybersecurity program responsibility — ensuring independence.

☑️ Evidence-Based Audits: Findings cannot rely only on management attestations. Reports must show tested evidence, identify weaknesses, and include plans for remediation.

☑️ Reasonable Cybersecurity Practices: The rule outlines expected controls: MFA, encryption, access management, secure configuration, patching, vulnerability scanning, monitoring, training, and more. These mirror industry best practices and FTC/state breach settlement standards.

☑️ Risk Assessments: Required for activities like selling/sharing personal information, processing sensitive data, or deploying ADMT in consumer-facing decisions.

 

This is a long-awaited regulation. Honestly, I expected stricter rules, but they were watered down to reduce business burden. Still, requiring annual cybersecurity audits for high-risk organizations is a big step forward.

My key concern is whether these audits will focus on real cybersecurity risks or just a hasztag#compliance approach. Too often, frameworks are used to prove compliance rather than fix actual security gaps.

From my perspective, an approach like SOC2 + could add real value: incorporating these CCPA requirements into a SOC 2 report would provide assurance under AICPA standards, ensuring both compliance and meaningful security oversight.

 

At the end of the day, this is about moving companies toward basic cyber hygiene: IAM, patching, vulnerability management, monitoring, secure configurations, and governance.



 
 
 

Comments


Stay in touch

META FOR MENA Information Technology Consultants Est.

City Avenue, 7th floor, office 706-0114

2 27 Street, Port Saeed, Deira, Dubai, United Arab Emirates
P.O. BOX: 40138
Licence N.O.: 1049080

Privacy policy

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • Instagram
bottom of page