Audit Transformation Report

The 2025 Audit Transformation Report, published by American Institute of Certified Public Accountants (AICPA), provides an insightful view into how the financial audit profession is evolving in response to rapid technological change, rising client expectations, and increasing regulatory pressure.

It is important to note that this report reflects theAICPA /CPA perspective — focused primarily on external financial auditors, not internal auditors.

However, many of the challenges and conclusions are universal across the assurance profession.

Obraz autorstwa rawpixel.com na Freepik

Technology

The report confirms that audit technology is advancing rapidly, driven by:

➡️ cloud platforms,

➡️ data analytics,

➡️ automation,

➡️ and growing experimentation with AI.

Yet despite this progress:

➡️ 75% of firms have no formally documented audit transformation plan,

➡️ nearly 25% do not use AI at all,

➡️ 22% report zero automated audit solutions.

Efficiency

Firms clearly see efficiency as the main motivation for transformation:

➡️ reduced audit hours,

➡️ lower administrative burden,

➡️ better use of staff time.

True transformation reallocates saved time toward:

➡️ deeper risk assessment,

➡️ higher-quality evidence,

➡️ stronger professional judgment,

➡️ and better client insight.

Risk-Driven Auditing

Although risk-based auditing has been part of standards for years, many firms:

➡️ still over-rely on prior-year workpapers,

➡️ struggle to tailor procedures to current risks,

➡️ find risk documentation difficult and time-consuming.

Metrics

Traditional metrics such as:

➡️ billable hours,

➡️ utilization,

➡️ realization,

are becoming less meaningful in technology-enabled audits.

The report highlights emerging metrics such as:

➡️ deliverable-based accountability,

➡️ client readiness,

➡️ audit margin per engagement,

➡️ value-based billing.

People, Skills & Change Management

The top barriers to audit transformation identified in the report include:

➡️ lack of staff training in advanced methodologies (66%),

➡️ poor client data quality (60%),

➡️ limited access to client systems (53%),

➡️ budget constraints (53%).

Technology alone is not enough — people must understand it, trust it, and know how to use it.

From my experience, if auditors want to keep up with client expectations, they must:

➡️ deliver more value,

➡️ in less time,

➡️ with better use of technology.

Technology brings speed and efficiency — but only when auditors truly understand it and apply it correctly. That requires new skills, continuous learning, and a shift in mindset.

One thing, however, does not change at all:

➡️  Client expectations around quality and value remain extremely high.

No amount of automation will compensate for weak judgment, poor risk assessment, or lack of professional skepticism.

Link

Author: Sebastian Burgemejster